<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Backlash Against Screening &amp; Prevention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedecisiontree.com/blog/2008/07/the-backlash-against-screening-prevention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedecisiontree.com/blog/2008/07/the-backlash-against-screening-prevention/</link>
	<description>a blog about predictive medicine and the future of healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:14:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirco</title>
		<link>http://thedecisiontree.com/blog/2008/07/the-backlash-against-screening-prevention/comment-page-1/#comment-4482</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://epidemix.org/blog/?p=261#comment-4482</guid>
		<description>The example is wrong.
It didn&#039;t say that multiple mammography is useful for the patients.
It only say that they know their disease before.
A cancer usually grow for many years before becoming detectable without mammography.
So it is not strange that early tester will be alive more after detecting the cancer. They probably would be alive even they didn&#039;t nothing about it.

People receiving multiple mammography live longer lives than people receiving less screening? This is the question that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The example is wrong.<br />
It didn&#8217;t say that multiple mammography is useful for the patients.<br />
It only say that they know their disease before.<br />
A cancer usually grow for many years before becoming detectable without mammography.<br />
So it is not strange that early tester will be alive more after detecting the cancer. They probably would be alive even they didn&#8217;t nothing about it.</p>
<p>People receiving multiple mammography live longer lives than people receiving less screening? This is the question that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

